ICE Reverses Decision on Deportation Without Hearing
The Department of Homeland Security has retracted what attorneys described as an unlawful maneuver to deport a woman who has resided in the United States nearly her entire life, bypassing an immigration court hearing.
Legal representatives for Mirta Amarilis Co Tupul, aged 38, filed a legal challenge earlier this month to halt her fast-tracked deportation to Guatemala. The lawsuit was dismissed by an Arizona federal judge after the government transitioned her case to the standard deportation procedure and consented not to attempt expedited removal again.
Ms. Co Tupul, now a single mother with three U.S. citizen children, arrived in the country at the tender age of nine, establishing her life here over almost three decades.
An emergency stay was initially granted by the judge to temporarily halt her deportation while the legal proceedings unfolded.
The lawsuit underscores significant worries that the Trump administration is potentially overextending immigration laws to hasten deportations, aiming to expel a maximum number of immigrants quickly.
According to 1996 federal regulations, immigrants residing in the United States for less than two years are subject to expedited removal, which circumvents the traditional immigration court process. In contrast, long-term residents are entitled to a judicial hearing before deportation.
An affidavit from one of Co Tupul’s lawyers described how a deportation officer cited a 'new policy' for placing immigrants in expedited proceedings after first encountering immigration enforcement.
Eric Lee, another of Co Tupul’s attorneys, stated, “This case seemed to be a trial in which the government sought to apply a novel policy against Ms. Co Tupul. The district court promptly repudiated this action. Perhaps this has tempered the government’s bid to broaden expedited removal, or it may be biding its time for a test case involving an unrepresented individual.”
The disappearance of fundamental legal aides at immigration courts and similar services coincides with the Trump administration reinforcing deportation initiatives.
Documents examined by The Times indicated that Co Tupul’s attorney substantiated her long-standing residency robustly. Nevertheless, immigration officials informed the attorney that her client would continue through expedited removal processes.
Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin, mentioned that after Co Tupul's legal team corroborated her more than two-year residency, “ICE complied with legal standards and proceeded with routine deportation hearings.”
McLaughlin also countered allegations claiming DHS was experimenting with a new policy concerning immigrants in the country over two years, categorically stating such claims are inaccurate.
On July 22, Co Tupul, a Phoenix local, was apprehended during a stop while traveling to her laundromat workplace. She remains detained at the Eloy Detention Center, positioned roughly 65 miles southeast of Phoenix.



Leave a Reply