Netflix's 'Running Point' Airs Amid Legal Battle with Pepperdine University
The debut of Mindy Kaling's latest sports comedy, 'Running Point', has coincided with controversy involving Pepperdine University. This new Netflix 10-part series stars Isla Gordon, played by Kate Hudson, as the president of the Los Angeles Waves, a fictional basketball team. Kaling, Hudson, and Jeanie Buss, who is the president of the Los Angeles Lakers, have taken on the roles of executive producers.
Legal Dispute Initiated
Just before the show’s premiere, Pepperdine University entered into a legal confrontation with Netflix and Warner Bros. Entertainment. On the 20th of February, they submitted a lawsuit claiming trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and misrepresentation through false advertising. They also sought a temporary restraining order to halt the series' launch.
The university expressed shock upon seeing promotional materials for 'Running Point', highlighting the similarities between their sports brand and the fictitious team. The alleged infringements were regarded as too many to be mere coincidence, according to the university's statement.
Moish E. Peltz, a legal expert from Falcon, Rappaport, & Berkman LLP, noted it was surprising that such a similar team concept made its way to market. Betsy Rosenblatt, a law professor emphasized the risky nature of these decisions made by major production companies.
Consumer Confusion and Trademark Concerns
The lawsuit claims 'Running Point's' basketball team logo, colors, and branding bear a striking resemblance to Pepperdine's actual team. The university also pointed out that a specific player number featured in the show parallels a number associated with their establishment's foundation.
Pepperdine argues this portrayal will mislead viewers into associating the team with them, which is compounded by content deemed inappropriate to the university's principles. Peltz highlighted that trademark laws exist to mitigate such consumer misconceptions.
Consideration of audience location is relevant; viewers in Southern California are more likely to notice these potential confusions compared to others. However, the possibility of confusion does not necessarily strengthen all aspects of the university's claims.
Trademark Dilution and Court Rulings
Beyond possible confusion, trademark dilution could weaken Pepperdine's brand, especially since 'Running Point' includes themes that diverge from the university's conservative outlook. Establishing the fame of the university's trademarks could be crucial to this argument.
Recently, the court rejected Pepperdine's request for a temporary injunction, which would have stopped certain representations linked to the 'Running Point' team. Netflix argued its portrayal was not misleading and had artistic significance.
Professor Rosenblatt reflected on how free speech laws allow creative uses of others’ trademarks, which played a part in the decision. Nevertheless, Pepperdine aims to maintain the fight against what it deems misuse of its intellectual property, as emphasized by their senior vice president's comments.




Leave a Reply