Critical Library Funding Slashed by DOGE Teams, Say Officials
Sweeping bureaucratic reductions by the former Trump administration have severely impacted a lesser-known public agency that previously funneled grant funds to libraries in the United States. This development poses a significant potential threat to the financial support libraries around the country rely on.
An employee from the Institute of Museum and Library Services alerted grant coordinators in a disconcerting email, revealed by CBS News, cautioning that the agency would be unable to operate or respond to emails, with no information provided on the timeline for future operations.
"You try calling and it just rings endlessly, as if there's nobody there," commented Mandy Knapp, state librarian and executive director in Ohio, during a CBS News interview.
On March 20, budget-cutter squads spearheaded by a billionaire mobilized on the Institute, an obscure federal body established by Congress in 1996 to oversee grants for libraries and museums nationwide. By late Wednesday, organizations funded by the Institute began receiving abrupt notifications that their grants would cease instantly, according to reports from a union representing local American Government Employees.
Late Wednesday, termination alerts were sent for over a dozen grants, seemingly chosen randomly, as stated by the union. California, Connecticut, and Washington were the first three states to receive notices affecting their state library funding.
This notification could not have been more untimely, library officials conveyed to CBS News. Randy Bolerjack, Washington's Deputy Secretary of State, explained that the funding supported 32 key positions at the Washington State Library, impacting libraries across sectors, including public, tribal, K-12, and community colleges.
The Institute has acknowledged its "Grants to States" initiative as the nation’s primary federal financial support for library services, with annual allocations exceeding $160 million. These grants are apportioned by population, granting state libraries the flexibility to distribute funds to local branches as deemed appropriate. In states such as Ohio and South Carolina, officials stressed to CBS News how critical this funding is for maintaining parity between rural libraries and their metropolitan counterparts.
Breanne Smith, Associate Deputy Director at South Carolina's state library, reported that state public libraries welcomed over 10 million visitors in the last year alone. According to Smith, libraries in rural regions serve as more than mere book-lending facilities.
"People rely on libraries not only for borrowing books but also for internet access and computer use. They act as community cornerstones," Smith remarked.
CBS obtained statements revealing that the notification of cuts to Washington’s library system came from Keith Sonderling, the Institute’s interim director and deputy director of the Labor Department. According to union representatives, the Trump administration claimed that the cuts were due to a perceived misalignment with the Institute’s priorities, a justification that Deputy Director Chris Yates of South Carolina's State Library finds baffling.
CBS News attempted to gather a response from the Labor Department but has yet to receive an answer.
Yates described the arbitrary nature of these cuts as leaving state library staff in a troubling state of limbo. Funds provided to South Carolina support libraries in all 43 counties, collectively serving over 5.4 million residents.
"Everyone's essentially left waiting to find out if they'll get notified," Yates informed CBS News.
Knapp explained that their funds extend beyond library sustenance: they bolster summer reading initiatives, provide specialized resources for visually impaired individuals, and introduce state-of-the-art technologies and internet services in remote areas. The integral summer reading program has already been halted, Knapp mentioned.
Yesterday, 127 Democratic Congress members dispatched a letter to the White House, imploring the administration to reconsider its choice to dismantle the agency. "Closing the Institute would imperil these vital services and dismiss the essential needs of millions who depend on libraries and museums for education, employment prospects, and societal engagement," the letter contends.
Senator Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, told CBS News that these cuts will diminish library resource availability, which he views as essential in fostering community ties.
"Trump’s proposal to dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services will barely dent the federal budget, yet it will severely hinder communities nationwide," Murphy declared.
Alongside legislative backing, four prominent publishing companies also sent Congress a letter highlighting concerns. They asserted, "Libraries serve as crucial community centers that offer free access to these valuable resources. Defunding libraries would trigger mass closures and collapse a system that today advantages millions of Americans."




Leave a Reply