Mike Waltz Advocates U.S. Actions at UN: "We Aren't Occupying Any Nation"
During a critical session at the United Nations, U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz stood firm in defending America's stance in Venezuela, asserting that neither a change in leadership nor an occupation by the U.S. was occurring. He reiterated that their recent military maneuver was a support tool for a law enforcement operation, rather than an offensive strike.
According to Waltz, "As mentioned by Secretary Rubio, there is no conflict with Venezuela or its citizens. We do not hold control over the country," referencing official statements. He clarified that this operation was intended to back existing legal charges, leading to the arrest of a drug trafficker who is set to face trial in the U.S. for long-standing offenses.
Waltz emphasized, "This is about delivering justice, not altering regimes," highlighting the operation's intended purpose.
UN Concerns and International Reactions
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed serious concern about the growing tensions in Venezuela, hinting at possible regional repercussions. He urged involved Venezuelan parties to pursue comprehensive dialogue while upholding human rights and legal standards.
France's foreign affairs head criticized the operation, labeling it a breach of international norms. However, President Emmanuel Macron distanced himself from giving any endorsement or approval.
U.S. Reluctance for Occupation and Strategic Choices
In a recent interview, it was reiterated that the U.S., while retaining various strategic options, did not aim for Venezuelan occupation. They suggested that President Trump preferred maintaining strategic flexibility and could consider military responses if faced with immediate threats. Currently, exerting economic pressure remains the primary method against remaining indicted figures in leadership.
Conversations included concerns about high-ranking Venezuelan officials, like Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello and Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino, who face U.S. charges and bounties. Senator Rubio pointed out the impracticality of a broader targeted operation, emphasizing focusing on high priorities rather than a complex, multi-site capture.
Rubio noted, "Imagine the backlash had we extended our stay for multiple days simply to arrest a few more individuals. We achieved our key objective," addressing potential criticisms.
Rubio continued to highlight how cutting financial sources for the current Venezuelan regime is the main pressure tactic. "Our current maneuvers include an oil embargo that amplifies our influence over forthcoming developments," he explained.



Leave a Reply