FCC Prohibits DJI Drones Starting Now – What You Need to Know

If you're operating drones within the United States, you may have encountered the attention-grabbing headlines announcing the 'DJI drone prohibition' that is now in effect.

So, what do these regulations entail for you? Will your drone be grounded abruptly? Are authorities poised to intervene if you decide to take flight? Is this merely bureaucratic protocol that doesn't actually concern you?

We aim to unravel the ongoing situation involving DJI, the U.S. government, and other drone producers, clarified for your understanding.

Why the Spotlight on This Today?

The issue is under today's spotlight — December 23, 2025 — because it marks the deadline for a comprehensive national security review concerning foreign drone manufacturers. The paradox is that such an audit was neither initiated, nor completed. The fault doesn’t lie with DJI; instead, it was due to a lack of assignment to any specific agency.

As the deadline passed unheeded, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proceeded to list foreign drone manufacturers as potential threats to U.S. national security. This list already features corporations such as Kaspersky, HTC, and Huawei.

As a consequence, manufacturers of 'uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS)' and parts made in foreign nations will not attain FCC endorsement for new offerings. Nevertheless, any existing inventory remains available for purchase.

Impact Beyond Drones

The prohibition extends its reach beyond drones, impacting devices like DJI action cameras, stabilizers, and microphones. Consequently, a wider audience in the U.S. owning DJI products might feel the effects, potentially disrupting a significant segment of the economy. Recently, Adam Welsh of DJI outlined the vast economic contributions from their technologies, suggesting support for over 460,000 jobs and a $116 billion economic influence.

There's ambiguity about whether current products may have their certifications pulled by the government, leading to a sales halt of existing merchandise. So far, existing products seem unaffected as DJI has assured, aligning with current observations.

Concerns extend to service issues and warranties. Drones often encounter mishaps, and DJI is reputed for its comprehensive repair and replacement policies. The FCC's ban might disrupt the supply of parts and warranty services. Reports have surfaced indicating delays or customs-related rejections of replacement drones.

Are Foreign Drones a Concern?

Has the U.S. government shown just cause for suspicion toward foreign-manufactured drones? Currently, there's no disclosed evidence of a security threat. Other nations seem less perturbed about drones of foreign origin, debunking severe concerns, despite occasional reports of unusual drone activities near high-security sites in the UK.

Is there a viable alternative ready to succeed DJI in the drone market, both consumer and commercial? Simply put, the answer is no. DJI maintains a substantial lead over potential competitors. Though some companies, including one based in Florida, are prepared to seize any market opportunity that arises from DJI's restrictions.

Predicting DJI's and the overall drone industry's future is challenging. The likelihood of the U.S. government retracting the ban seems slim, suggesting persistent restrictions. Without domestic alternatives, both the usage and market of drones could hit a standstill, adversely affecting businesses and enthusiasts reliant on drones.